Clinical Trials Search at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Expanded Access Study for the Treatment of Patients With Commercially Out-of-Specification Brexucabtagene Autoleucel
Multiple Cancer Types
The goal of this study is to provide access to brexucabtagene autoleucel for patients diagnosed with a disease approved for treatment with brexucabtagene autoleucel, that is otherwise out of specification for commercial release.
Leukemia,
Lymphoma
N/A
Jallouk, Andrew
NCT05776134
VICC-XDCTT23451
Testing the Addition of Total Ablative Therapy to Usual Systemic Therapy Treatment for Limited Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, The ERASur Study
This phase III trial compares total ablative therapy and usual systemic therapy to usual systemic therapy alone in treating patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to up to 4 body sites (limited metastatic). The usual approach for patients who are not participating in a study is treatment with intravenous (IV) (through a vein) and/or oral medications (systemic therapy) to help stop the cancer sites from getting larger and the spread of the cancer to additional body sites. Ablative means that the intention of the local treatment is to eliminate the cancer at that metastatic site. The ablative local therapy will consist of very focused, intensive radiotherapy called stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with or without surgical resection and/or microwave ablation, which is a procedure where a needle is temporarily inserted in the tumor and heat is used to destroy the cancer cells. SABR, surgical resection, and microwave ablation have been tested for safety, but it is not scientifically proven that the addition of these treatments are beneficial for your stage of cancer. The addition of ablative local therapy to all known metastatic sites to the usual approach of systemic therapy could shrink or remove the tumor(s) or prevent the tumor(s) from returning.
Not Available
III
Not Available
NCT05673148
VICC-NTGIT23268
Trial of Orca-T Following Reduced Intensity or Nonmyeloablative Conditioning in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Multiple Cancer Types
This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Orca-T in participants undergoing reduced intensity or non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for hematologic malignancies. Orca-T is an allogeneic stem cell and T-cell immunotherapy biologic manufactured for each patient (transplant recipient) from the mobilized peripheral blood of a specific, unique donor. It is composed of purified hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), purified regulatory T cells (Tregs), and conventional T cells (Tcons).
Leukemia,
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
II
Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai
NCT07216443
VICCCTT25025
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, ZEN003694, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Capecitabine) for Metastatic or Unresectable Cancers
Multiple Cancer Types
This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of ZEN003694 in combination with the usual treatment with capecitabine in treating patients with cancer that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable) and that it has progressed on previous standard treatment. ZEN003694 is an inhibitor of a family of proteins called the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET). It may prevent the growth of tumor cells that over produce BET protein. Capecitabine is in a class of medications called antimetabolites. It is taken up by cancer cells and breaks down into fluorouracil, a substance that kills cancer cells. Giving ZEN003694 in combination with capecitabine may be safe in treating patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors.
Colon,
Phase I,
Rectal
I
Heumann, Thatcher
NCT05803382
VICC-NTPHI23420
Clinical Trial of YH32367 in Patients With HER2 Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumor
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
This first-in-human study will be counducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-tumor activity of YH32367 in Patients with HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors.
Miscellaneous
I/II
Heumann, Thatcher
NCT05523947
VICC-DTMDT24023
Cabozantinib for Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Meningioma
Neuro-Oncology
Neuro-Oncology
A Phase II Study of Cabozantinib for Patients with Recurrent or Progressive Meningioma
Neuro-Oncology
II
Mohler, Alexander
NCT05425004
VICC-ITNEU23261
Study of Rondecabtagene Autoleucel in Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Lymphoma
Lymphoma
This is a Phase 1/2, multi-center, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of rondecabtagene autoleucel (ronde-cel) also known as LYL314, a dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) targeting cluster of differentiation (CD)19 and CD20 in participants with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma.
Lymphoma
I/II
Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai
NCT05826535
VICCCTT25034
An Open-label Dose Escalation/Expansion Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Anti-tumor Activity of TEV-56278 Alone or in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
The primary objectives of this trial are to:
* Characterize the safety and tolerability of TEV-56278
* Determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
* Evaluate antitumor activity of TEV-56278
* Determine the safety and tolerability of TEV-56278 in combination with pembrolizumab
* Determine a RP2D of TEV-56278 in combination with pembrolizumab
The secondary objectives of this trial are to:
* Characterize the serum pharmacokinetics of TEV-56278
* Evaluate the antitumor activity of TEV-56278
* Determine the safety and tolerability of TEV-56278
* Evaluate other measures of antitumor activity of TEV-56278
* Evaluate anti-tumor activity
Participants will be treated up to 12 months with a follow-up period of up to 12 months after last infusion. The total duration of the trial will be up to 25 months for individual participants.
* Characterize the safety and tolerability of TEV-56278
* Determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
* Evaluate antitumor activity of TEV-56278
* Determine the safety and tolerability of TEV-56278 in combination with pembrolizumab
* Determine a RP2D of TEV-56278 in combination with pembrolizumab
The secondary objectives of this trial are to:
* Characterize the serum pharmacokinetics of TEV-56278
* Evaluate the antitumor activity of TEV-56278
* Determine the safety and tolerability of TEV-56278
* Evaluate other measures of antitumor activity of TEV-56278
* Evaluate anti-tumor activity
Participants will be treated up to 12 months with a follow-up period of up to 12 months after last infusion. The total duration of the trial will be up to 25 months for individual participants.
Miscellaneous
I
Johnson, Douglas
NCT06480552
VICC-DTPHI24182
Cephea Early Feasibility Study
The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in whom transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery.
Not Available
Early I
Goel, Kashish
NCT05061004
VALV0016
Endoscopic Gastroenterostomy Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy
Gastrointestinal
Gastrointestinal
Recent comparative data suggest that EUS gastroenterostomy offers more durable patency than enteral stents for treatment of malignant GOO, leading some endoscopists to suggest that EUS gastroenterostomy should be the preferred endoscopic treatment approach.
EUS gastroenterostomy and surgical gastrojejunostomy have been compared in retrospective cohort analysis, suggesting a high technical success rate a shorter hospital length of stay for the endoscopic approach \[4\]. Comparison of these techniques has not been reported in controlled prospective fashion. A prospective trial is necessary in order to define the optimal interventional management option for treatment of malignant GOO in the context of the contemporary and rapidly evolved range of available endoscopic and surgical treatment options.
EUS gastroenterostomy and surgical gastrojejunostomy have been compared in retrospective cohort analysis, suggesting a high technical success rate a shorter hospital length of stay for the endoscopic approach \[4\]. Comparison of these techniques has not been reported in controlled prospective fashion. A prospective trial is necessary in order to define the optimal interventional management option for treatment of malignant GOO in the context of the contemporary and rapidly evolved range of available endoscopic and surgical treatment options.
Gastrointestinal
N/A
Yachimski, Patrick
NCT06567691
VICCGI24560
